Comparison

Polvo em azeite vs Polipetti alla Luciana

Overall, Polvo em azeite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPolvo em azeitePolipetti alla Luciana
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 2 3
Calories 104 kcal 212 kcal
Fat 4.4 g 13 g
Saturated fat 2 g 2.4 g
Sugars 0 g 3.6 g
Salt 0.7 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 16.5 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensMolluscsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Polvo em azeite has 51% fewer calories (104 kcal vs 212 kcal).
  • Polvo em azeite has 67% less fat (4.4 g vs 13 g).
  • Polvo em azeite has 17% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Polvo em azeite has no sugar, while Polipetti alla Luciana has 3.6 g.
  • Polipetti alla Luciana has no salt, while Polvo em azeite has 0.7 g.
  • Polipetti alla Luciana has 13% more protein (19 g vs 16.5 g).
  • Polipetti alla Luciana has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Polvo em azeite is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Polvo em azeite lists: Molluscs.

Ingredients

Polvo em azeite

Poulpe 57%, huile d'olive, sel

Polipetti alla Luciana

Polpa di pomodoro 50%, POLPO indopacifico 40%, olive verdi, olio extravergine di oliva, vino bianco, olio di girasole, sale, aglio, prezzemolo

FAQ

Which is healthier: Polvo em azeite or Polipetti alla Luciana?

Overall, Polvo em azeite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Polvo em azeite has fewer calories: 104 kcal versus 212 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Polvo em azeite has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons