Poulpe Ail et Persil vs Polpo cotto al naturale
Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poulpe Ail et Persil | Polpo cotto al naturale |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 62% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 200 kcal).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 88% less fat (1.5 g vs 13 g).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 62% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has no sugar, while Poulpe Ail et Persil has 0.5 g.
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 56% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- Poulpe Ail et Persil has 29% more protein (21 g vs 15 g).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Poulpe Ail et Persil
Poulpes 87%, huiles infusées, Ail 2%, sel, jus concentré de citron
Polpo cotto al naturale
Polpo (molluschi) (Octopus cyanea), sale, acqua
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poulpe Ail et Persil or Polpo cotto al naturale?
Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polpo cotto al naturale has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.