Comparison

Pipas de calabaza vs Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen

Overall, Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipas de calabazaGeröstete Kürbiskerne, gesal...
Nutri-Score e a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 479 kcal 533 kcal
Fat 34 g 36 g
Saturated fat 6.8 g 7 g
Sugars 1.7 g 2.7 g
Salt 4 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.1 g 0 g
Protein 23 g 37 g
Additives00
AllergensNuts, PeanutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas de calabaza has 10% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 533 kcal).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 37% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has 94% less salt (0.2 g vs 4 g).
  • Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has 38% more protein (37 g vs 23 g).
  • Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pipas de calabaza lists: Nuts, Peanuts.

Ingredients

Pipas de calabaza

Pipas de calabaza, sal y harina de arroz.

Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen

Graines de courge, sel de cuisine.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas de calabaza or Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen?

Overall, Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons