Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal vs Pipas de calabaza
Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas calabaza tostadas agua... | Pipas de calabaza |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 624 kcal | 479 kcal |
| Fat | 52.4 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.7 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 4.8 g | 4 g |
| Fiber | 8 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 34.1 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts, Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas de calabaza has 23% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 624 kcal).
- Pipas de calabaza has 35% less fat (34 g vs 52.4 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 36% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 10.7 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 17% less salt (4 g vs 4.8 g).
- Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has 98% more fiber (8 g vs 0.1 g).
- Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has 33% more protein (34.1 g vs 23 g).
- Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pipas de calabaza is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pipas de calabaza lists: Peanuts.
Ingredients
Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal
Pipas de calabaza, sal, colorante (E171),
Pipas de calabaza
Pipas de calabaza, sal y harina de arroz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal or Pipas de calabaza?
Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.