Comparison

Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal vs Pipas de calabaza

Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipas calabaza tostadas agua...Pipas de calabaza
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 624 kcal 479 kcal
Fat 52.4 g 34 g
Saturated fat 10.7 g 6.8 g
Sugars 2.5 g 1.7 g
Salt 4.8 g 4 g
Fiber 8 g 0.1 g
Protein 34.1 g 23 g
Additives10
AllergensNutsNuts, Peanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas de calabaza has 23% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 624 kcal).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 35% less fat (34 g vs 52.4 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 36% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 17% less salt (4 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has 98% more fiber (8 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has 33% more protein (34.1 g vs 23 g).
  • Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pipas de calabaza is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pipas de calabaza lists: Peanuts.

Ingredients

Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal

Pipas de calabaza, sal, colorante (E171),

Pipas de calabaza

Pipas de calabaza, sal y harina de arroz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal or Pipas de calabaza?

Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons