Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal vs Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal
Overall, Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal
Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipa de calabaza tostada con... | Pipas calabaza tostadas agua... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 624 kcal | 624 kcal |
| Fat | 52 g | 52.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 10.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 4.8 g |
| Fiber | 8 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 34 g | 34.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 69% less salt (1.5 g vs 4.8 g).
- Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal
Pipas de calabaza, sal, espesante (goma guar)
Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal
Pipas de calabaza, sal, colorante (E171),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal or Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal?
Overall, Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has fewer calories: 624 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.