Comparison

Pipas de calabaza vs Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal

Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipas de calabazaPipas calabaza tostadas agua...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 479 kcal 624 kcal
Fat 34 g 52.4 g
Saturated fat 6.8 g 10.7 g
Sugars 1.7 g 2.5 g
Salt 10.4 g 4.8 g
Fiber 18 g 8 g
Protein 23 g 34.1 g
Additives01
AllergensNoneNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas de calabaza has 23% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 624 kcal).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 35% less fat (34 g vs 52.4 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 36% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has 54% less salt (4.8 g vs 10.4 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 56% more fiber (18 g vs 8 g).
  • Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has 33% more protein (34.1 g vs 23 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pipas de calabaza lists: None.
  • Only Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Pipas de calabaza

Pipas de calabaza 84%, sal 15%, harina de arroz.

Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal

Pipas de calabaza, sal, colorante (E171),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas de calabaza or Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal?

Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons