Pipas de calabaza vs Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen
Overall, Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas de calabaza | Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesal... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 479 kcal | 533 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 36 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Salt | 10.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 18 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 37 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas de calabaza has 10% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 533 kcal).
- Pipas de calabaza has 37% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.7 g).
- Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has 98% less salt (0.2 g vs 10.4 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 100% more fiber (18 g vs 0 g).
- Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has 38% more protein (37 g vs 23 g).
- Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pipas de calabaza lists: None.
Ingredients
Pipas de calabaza
Pipas de calabaza 84%, sal 15%, harina de arroz.
Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen
Graines de courge, sel de cuisine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas de calabaza or Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen?
Overall, Geröstete Kürbiskerne, gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 533 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.7 g per 100 g.