Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen vs Pipas de calabaza
Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kürbiskerne geröstet und ges... | Pipas de calabaza |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 432 kcal | 479 kcal |
| Fat | 35.5 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 7.3 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 10.4 g |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 18 g |
| Protein | 21.3 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas de calabaza has 19% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.1 g).
- Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 74% less salt (2.8 g vs 10.4 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 69% more fiber (18 g vs 5.6 g).
- Only Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen lists: Gluten.
- Only Pipas de calabaza lists: None.
Ingredients
Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen
97% Pumpkin Seeds, 2.8% Salt, Wheat Flour.
Pipas de calabaza
Pipas de calabaza 84%, sal 15%, harina de arroz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen or Pipas de calabaza?
Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has fewer calories: 432 kcal versus 479 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.