Comparison

Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen vs Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal

Overall, Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKürbiskerne geröstet und ges...Pipas calabaza tostadas agua...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 432 kcal 624 kcal
Fat 35.5 g 52.4 g
Saturated fat 7.3 g 10.7 g
Sugars 2.1 g 2.5 g
Salt 2.8 g 4.8 g
Fiber 5.6 g 8 g
Protein 21.3 g 34.1 g
Additives01
AllergensGlutenNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 31% fewer calories (432 kcal vs 624 kcal).
  • Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 32% less fat (35.5 g vs 52.4 g).
  • Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 32% less saturated fat (7.3 g vs 10.7 g).
  • Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 16% less sugar (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 43% less salt (2.8 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has 30% more fiber (8 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal has 38% more protein (34.1 g vs 21.3 g).
  • Only Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen lists: Gluten.
  • Only Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen

97% Pumpkin Seeds, 2.8% Salt, Wheat Flour.

Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal

Pipas de calabaza, sal, colorante (E171),

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen or Pipas calabaza tostadas agua-sal?

Overall, Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has fewer calories: 432 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons