Comparison

Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen vs Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal

Overall, Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKürbiskerne geröstet und ges...Pipa de calabaza tostada con...
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 432 kcal 624 kcal
Fat 35.5 g 52 g
Saturated fat 7.3 g 11 g
Sugars 2.1 g 2.5 g
Salt 2.8 g 1.5 g
Fiber 5.6 g 8 g
Protein 21.3 g 34 g
Additives01
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 31% fewer calories (432 kcal vs 624 kcal).
  • Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 32% less fat (35.5 g vs 52 g).
  • Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 34% less saturated fat (7.3 g vs 11 g).
  • Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has 16% less sugar (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 45% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 30% more fiber (8 g vs 5.6 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 37% more protein (34 g vs 21.3 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen

97% Pumpkin Seeds, 2.8% Salt, Wheat Flour.

Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal

Pipas de calabaza, sal, espesante (goma guar)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen or Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal?

Overall, Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has fewer calories: 432 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kürbiskerne geröstet und gesalzen has less sugar: 2.1 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons