Comparison

Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal vs Pipas de calabaza

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipa de calabaza tostada con...Pipas de calabaza
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 624 kcal 479 kcal
Fat 52 g 34 g
Saturated fat 11 g 6.8 g
Sugars 2.5 g 1.7 g
Salt 1.5 g 4 g
Fiber 8 g 0.1 g
Protein 34 g 23 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNuts, Peanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas de calabaza has 23% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 624 kcal).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 35% less fat (34 g vs 52 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 38% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 11 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 63% less salt (1.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 98% more fiber (8 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 32% more protein (34 g vs 23 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pipas de calabaza is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pipas de calabaza lists: Nuts, Peanuts.

Ingredients

Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal

Pipas de calabaza, sal, espesante (goma guar)

Pipas de calabaza

Pipas de calabaza, sal y harina de arroz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal or Pipas de calabaza?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons