Comparison
Pipas de calabaza vs Pipas de calabaza
Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas de calabaza | Pipas de calabaza |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 479 kcal | 479 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 6.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 10.4 g | 4 g |
| Fiber | 18 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 23 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None | Nuts, Peanuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas de calabaza has 62% less salt (4 g vs 10.4 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 99% more fiber (18 g vs 0.1 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pipas de calabaza lists: None.
- Only Pipas de calabaza lists: Nuts, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Pipas de calabaza
Pipas de calabaza 84%, sal 15%, harina de arroz.
Pipas de calabaza
Pipas de calabaza, sal y harina de arroz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas de calabaza or Pipas de calabaza?
Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 479 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Pipas calabaza tostadas... vs Pipas de calabaza
Pipa de calabaza tostada... vs Pipas de calabaza
Kürbiskerne geröstet und... vs Pipas de calabaza
Pipas de calabaza vs Geröstete Kürbiskerne, g...
Graines de courge grillé... vs Pipas de calabaza
Mild chili roasted pumpk... vs Pipas de calabaza
Kürbiskerne geröstet und... vs Pipas de calabaza
Pipas de calabaza vs Geröstete Kürbiskerne, g...