Comparison

Pipas de calabaza vs Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal

Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipas de calabazaPipa de calabaza tostada con...
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 479 kcal 624 kcal
Fat 34 g 52 g
Saturated fat 6.8 g 11 g
Sugars 1.7 g 2.5 g
Salt 10.4 g 1.5 g
Fiber 18 g 8 g
Protein 23 g 34 g
Additives01
AllergensNoneNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas de calabaza has 23% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 624 kcal).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 35% less fat (34 g vs 52 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 38% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 11 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 86% less salt (1.5 g vs 10.4 g).
  • Pipas de calabaza has 56% more fiber (18 g vs 8 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 32% more protein (34 g vs 23 g).
  • Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pipas de calabaza is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pipas de calabaza lists: None.

Ingredients

Pipas de calabaza

Pipas de calabaza 84%, sal 15%, harina de arroz.

Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal

Pipas de calabaza, sal, espesante (goma guar)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas de calabaza or Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal?

Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons