Pipas de calabaza vs Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal
Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas de calabaza | Pipa de calabaza tostada con... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 479 kcal | 624 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.8 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 10.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 18 g | 8 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 34 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas de calabaza has 23% fewer calories (479 kcal vs 624 kcal).
- Pipas de calabaza has 35% less fat (34 g vs 52 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 38% less saturated fat (6.8 g vs 11 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 32% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
- Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 86% less salt (1.5 g vs 10.4 g).
- Pipas de calabaza has 56% more fiber (18 g vs 8 g).
- Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has 32% more protein (34 g vs 23 g).
- Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pipas de calabaza is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pipas de calabaza lists: None.
Ingredients
Pipas de calabaza
Pipas de calabaza 84%, sal 15%, harina de arroz.
Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal
Pipas de calabaza, sal, espesante (goma guar)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas de calabaza or Pipa de calabaza tostada con sal?
Overall, Pipas de calabaza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas de calabaza has fewer calories: 479 kcal versus 624 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas de calabaza has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.