Comparison

Pilaf de petit épeautre vs Espelta crujiente ecológica

Overall, Pilaf de petit épeautre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPilaf de petit épeautreEspelta crujiente ecológica
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 72 kcal 361 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.2 g
Sugars 3.4 g 11 g
Salt 0.5 g 1.9 g
Fiber 2.8 g —
Protein 2.3 g 13 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pilaf de petit épeautre has 80% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 361 kcal).
  • Espelta crujiente ecológica has 60% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Pilaf de petit épeautre has 69% less sugar (3.4 g vs 11 g).
  • Pilaf de petit épeautre has 75% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Espelta crujiente ecológica has 82% more protein (13 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Pilaf de petit épeautre has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Pilaf de petit épeautre lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Pilaf de petit épeautre

Tomates*(orig. France), coulis de tomate* (27% | orig. France), oignons*, petit épéautre* (9,2 % | gluten | orig. Sud-Ouest), parmesan* (2 % | lait), huile de tournesol première pression à froid* (orig. Sud-Ouest), basilic* (1%), sel de Guérande garanti Nature & Progrès, ail*, poivre*.

Espelta crujiente ecológica

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pilaf de petit épeautre or Espelta crujiente ecológica?

Overall, Pilaf de petit épeautre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pilaf de petit épeautre has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pilaf de petit épeautre has less sugar: 3.4 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons