Coco pops palline vs Espelta crujiente ecológica
Overall, Espelta crujiente ecológica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco pops palline | Espelta crujiente ecológica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 385 kcal | 361 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 26 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | — |
| Protein | 6.1 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Espelta crujiente ecológica has 14% less fat (2.4 g vs 2.8 g).
- Espelta crujiente ecológica has 87% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Espelta crujiente ecológica has 58% less sugar (11 g vs 26 g).
- Coco pops palline has 62% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.9 g).
- Espelta crujiente ecológica has 53% more protein (13 g vs 6.1 g).
Ingredients
Coco pops palline
Farina di mais, zucchero, sciroppo di glucosio, cacao in polvere(3%), cacao magro in polvere(2.5%), pasta di cacao, sale, carbonato acido di sodio, aroma naturale. Grassi di cui acidi grassi saturi Carboidrati
Espelta crujiente ecológica
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco pops palline or Espelta crujiente ecológica?
Overall, Espelta crujiente ecológica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Espelta crujiente ecológica has fewer calories: 361 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Espelta crujiente ecológica has less sugar: 11 g versus 26 g per 100 g.