Pain vs Oberlander
Overall, Pain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pain | Oberlander |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 237 kcal | 232 kcal |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 6 g | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 8.9 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oberlander has 72% less fat (0.9 g vs 3.2 g).
- Pain has 16% more protein (8.9 g vs 7.5 g).
- Pain has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pain is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pain
farine de blé complet 47%, eau, farine de blé, levain (blé, seigle), levure, huile de colza, flocons de froment far de feve, sel iodé, farine de malt ( blé, orge),
Oberlander
48% tarwebloem, water, 14% roggebloem, 7,7% volkoren roggemeel, gejodeerd zout, bakkersgist, tarwegluten, zuurteregelaar (natriumacetaten [E262]), gerstemoutmeel, antioxidant (ascorbinezuur [E300]). Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 1.07g per 100 gram
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pain or Oberlander?
Overall, Pain has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oberlander has fewer calories: 232 kcal versus 237 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pain has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.