Comparison

Oat Bran vs AXA Fiber havregryn

Overall, Oat Bran has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Better choice
Oat Bran

Oat Bran

Quaker · 625 g
a NOVA 1
AXA Fiber havregryn

AXA Fiber havregryn

AXA · 800 g
a

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOat BranAXA Fiber havregryn
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 208 kcal 350 kcal
Fat 7.5 g 7 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 1.3 g
Sugars 1 g 1.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 4 g 14 g
Protein 15 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Oat Bran has 41% fewer calories (208 kcal vs 350 kcal).
  • AXA Fiber havregryn has 71% more fiber (14 g vs 4 g).
  • Oat Bran has 20% more protein (15 g vs 12 g).
  • Only AXA Fiber havregryn lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Oat Bran

oat bran

AXA Fiber havregryn

oatmeal 87% (whole grains, trimmed, steam-prepared and rolled), wheat bran (steam proofed)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Oat Bran or AXA Fiber havregryn?

Overall, Oat Bran has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Oat Bran has fewer calories: 208 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Oat Bran has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Oat Bran vs Simply porridge oats Simply porridge oats vs AXA Fiber havregryn Oat Bran vs Grano de avena cocida AXA Fiber havregryn vs Grano de avena cocida Oat Bran vs Havermout Chocolade Bana... Oat Bran vs Rote Grütze (Himbeer-Ges... Oat Bran vs Oat Groats Havermout Chocolade Bana... vs AXA Fiber havregryn