AXA Fiber havregryn vs Grano de avena cocida
Overall, Grano de avena cocida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | AXA Fiber havregryn | Grano de avena cocida |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 134 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | 4.6 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 6.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Avena |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Grano de avena cocida has 62% fewer calories (134 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Grano de avena cocida has 50% less fat (3.5 g vs 7 g).
- Grano de avena cocida has 52% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Grano de avena cocida has 76% less sugar (0.3 g vs 1.3 g).
- AXA Fiber havregryn has 67% more fiber (14 g vs 4.6 g).
- AXA Fiber havregryn has 44% more protein (12 g vs 6.7 g).
- Only Grano de avena cocida lists: Avena.
Ingredients
AXA Fiber havregryn
oatmeal 87% (whole grains, trimmed, steam-prepared and rolled), wheat bran (steam proofed)
Grano de avena cocida
_Avena_ cocida 98% (agua, _avena_ (_gluten_)), aceite de girasol, sal marina, emulgente (lecitina de girasol).
FAQ
Which is healthier: AXA Fiber havregryn or Grano de avena cocida?
Overall, Grano de avena cocida has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Grano de avena cocida has fewer calories: 134 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grano de avena cocida has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.