Comparison

Merlu blanc basquaise et riz vs Dos de merlu blanc surgelé

Overall, Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Merlu blanc basquaise et riz	Dos de merlu blanc surgelé
Nutri-Score	b	a
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	175 kcal	66 kcal
Fat	3.4 g	0.5 g
Saturated fat	0.3 g	0.1 g
Sugars	1.8 g	1.6 g
Salt	0.4 g	0.1 g
Protein	6.2 g	16.6 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has 62% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 175 kcal).
Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has 87% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.4 g).
Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has 63% more protein (16.6 g vs 6.2 g).
Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Merlu blanc basquaise et riz

Not available.

Dos de merlu blanc surgelé

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Merlu blanc basquaise et riz or Dos de merlu blanc surgelé?

Overall, Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Merlu blanc basquaise et... vs Coeur de filets de merlu... Filets de Merlu Blanc vs Dos de merlu blanc surge... Filets de Merlu Blanc vs Merlu blanc basquaise et... Merlu blanc sauce Marini... vs Dos de merlu blanc surge... Filet de merlu blanc du... vs Dos de merlu blanc surge... Filet de merlu blanc vs Dos de merlu blanc surge... Merlu blanc basquaise et... vs Merlu blanc sauce Marini... Filet de merlu blanc du... vs Merlu blanc basquaise et...