Comparison

Merlu blanc basquaise et riz vs Coeur de filets de merlu blanc

Overall, Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMerlu blanc basquaise et rizCoeur de filets de merlu bla...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group — 3
Calories 175 kcal 65 kcal
Fat 3.4 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0 g
Sugars 1.8 g 0 g
Salt 0.4 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 6.2 g 15 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has 63% fewer calories (65 kcal vs 175 kcal).
  • Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has 82% less fat (0.6 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has no saturated fat, while Merlu blanc basquaise et riz has 0.3 g.
  • Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has no sugar, while Merlu blanc basquaise et riz has 1.8 g.
  • Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has no salt, while Merlu blanc basquaise et riz has 0.4 g.
  • Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has 59% more protein (15 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Coeur de filets de merlu blanc lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Merlu blanc basquaise et riz

Not available.

Coeur de filets de merlu blanc

Merlu blanc

FAQ

Which is healthier: Merlu blanc basquaise et riz or Coeur de filets de merlu blanc?

Overall, Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Coeur de filets de merlu blanc has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons