Merlu blanc basquaise et riz vs Filet de merlu blanc
Overall, Filet de merlu blanc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Merlu blanc basquaise et riz | Filet de merlu blanc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 175 kcal | 94 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | — |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de merlu blanc has 46% fewer calories (94 kcal vs 175 kcal).
- Filet de merlu blanc has 41% less fat (2 g vs 3.4 g).
- Merlu blanc basquaise et riz has 70% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Merlu blanc basquaise et riz has 64% less sugar (1.8 g vs 5 g).
- Filet de merlu blanc has 61% more protein (16 g vs 6.2 g).
Ingredients
Merlu blanc basquaise et riz
Not available.
Filet de merlu blanc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Merlu blanc basquaise et riz or Filet de merlu blanc?
Overall, Filet de merlu blanc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de merlu blanc has fewer calories: 94 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Merlu blanc basquaise et riz has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 5 g per 100 g.