Comparison

Filet de merlu blanc vs Dos de merlu blanc surgelé

Overall, Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Filet de merlu blanc	Dos de merlu blanc surgelé
Nutri-Score	—	a
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	94 kcal	66 kcal
Fat	2 g	0.5 g
Saturated fat	1 g	0.1 g
Sugars	5 g	1.6 g
Salt	—	0.1 g
Protein	16 g	16.6 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has 30% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 94 kcal).
Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has 78% less fat (0.5 g vs 2 g).
Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has 87% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has 68% less sugar (1.6 g vs 5 g).

Ingredients

Filet de merlu blanc

Not available.

Dos de merlu blanc surgelé

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de merlu blanc or Dos de merlu blanc surgelé?

Overall, Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 94 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dos de merlu blanc surgelé has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Filet de merlu blanc vs Coeur de filets de merlu... Filets de Merlu Blanc vs Dos de merlu blanc surge... Filets de Merlu Blanc vs Filet de merlu blanc Merlu blanc sauce Marini... vs Dos de merlu blanc surge... Filet de merlu blanc du... vs Dos de merlu blanc surge... Filet de merlu blanc vs Merlu blanc sauce Marini... Filet de merlu blanc du... vs Filet de merlu blanc Merlu blanc basquaise et... vs Dos de merlu blanc surge...