Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature vs Merlu blanc basquaise et riz
Overall, Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de merlu blanc du cap,... | Merlu blanc basquaise et riz |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 66 kcal | 175 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 3.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 6.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature has 62% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 175 kcal).
- Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature has 82% less fat (0.6 g vs 3.4 g).
- Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature has 94% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature has 58% more protein (14.7 g vs 6.2 g).
- Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature
Not available.
Merlu blanc basquaise et riz
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature or Merlu blanc basquaise et riz?
Overall, Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de merlu blanc du cap, nature has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.