Comparison

Mediterranean Style Grains vs Seed Mix

Overall, Seed Mix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMediterranean Style GrainsSeed Mix
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 178 kcal 576 kcal
Fat 3 g 46.3 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 6 g
Sugars 17 g 1.3 g
Salt 0.4 g 0 g
Fiber — 8.7 g
Protein 5.3 g 23 g
Additives10
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mediterranean Style Grains has 69% fewer calories (178 kcal vs 576 kcal).
  • Mediterranean Style Grains has 94% less fat (3 g vs 46.3 g).
  • Mediterranean Style Grains has 95% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 6 g).
  • Seed Mix has 92% less sugar (1.3 g vs 17 g).
  • Seed Mix has no salt, while Mediterranean Style Grains has 0.4 g.
  • Seed Mix has 77% more protein (23 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Seed Mix has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Seed Mix is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Mediterranean Style Grains lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Mediterranean Style Grains

Cooked Pearl Barley (68%), Cooked Pinto Beans (12%), Cooked Red Quinoa (10%), Tomato Paste, Sunflower Oil, Flavouring, Black Olives, Sundried Tomatoes Pieces, Black Pepper, Colour: Paprika Extract; Oregano, Salt. ! Allergy advice: For allergens, including cereals containing gluten, see ingredients in bold

Seed Mix

35% Sunflower Seeds, 35% Pumpkin Seeds, 15% Hemp Seeds, 15% Golden Linseed, traces (Nuts, Peanuts, Sesame)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Mediterranean Style Grains or Seed Mix?

Overall, Seed Mix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mediterranean Style Grains has fewer calories: 178 kcal versus 576 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Seed Mix has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 17 g per 100 g.

More comparisons