Mar Herring w dill MSC vs Matjes Filets
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Mar Herring w dill MSC | Matjes Filets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 208 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 9.6 g | 12.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 18 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 3 g | 5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 11 g | 12.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matjes Filets has 16% fewer calories (174 kcal vs 208 kcal).
- Mar Herring w dill MSC has 25% less fat (9.6 g vs 12.8 g).
- Matjes Filets has 89% less sugar (2 g vs 18 g).
- Mar Herring w dill MSC has 40% less salt (3 g vs 5 g).
- Matjes Filets has 13% more protein (12.7 g vs 11 g).
- Mar Herring w dill MSC is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Mar Herring w dill MSC
Filets de _harengs_ (Clupea harengus) sans peau en morceaux (50 %), sucre, sel, oignon, aneth (0,4 %), poivre de la Jamaïque, conservateur (E211), vinaigre d'alcool.
Matjes Filets
98% Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art (_Heringsfilets_, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Säureregulator: Natriumlactat, Natriumacetate; Gewürzextrakte), Rapsöl.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Mar Herring w dill MSC or Matjes Filets?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matjes Filets has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 208 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Matjes Filets has less sugar: 2 g versus 18 g per 100 g.