Filetti di aringa con cipolle vs Matjes Filets
Overall, Filetti di aringa con cipolle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Filetti di aringa con cipolle
Matjes Filets
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filetti di aringa con cipoll... | Matjes Filets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 184 kcal | 174 kcal |
| Fat | 15.5 g | 12.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 12.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Matjes Filets has 17% less fat (12.8 g vs 15.5 g).
- Matjes Filets has 37% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Filetti di aringa con cipolle has 60% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Filetti di aringa con cipolle has 72% less salt (1.4 g vs 5 g).
- Matjes Filets has 21% more protein (12.7 g vs 10 g).
- Filetti di aringa con cipolle has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Matjes Filets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filetti di aringa con cipolle
Not available.
Matjes Filets
98% Matjesfilets nach nordischer Art (_Heringsfilets_, Speisesalz, Dextrose, Säureregulator: Natriumlactat, Natriumacetate; Gewürzextrakte), Rapsöl.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filetti di aringa con cipolle or Matjes Filets?
Overall, Filetti di aringa con cipolle has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Matjes Filets has fewer calories: 174 kcal versus 184 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filetti di aringa con cipolle has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2 g per 100 g.