Kikkererwtenwafel vs Kikkererwtenwafels
Overall, Kikkererwtenwafel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kikkererwtenwafel | Kikkererwtenwafels |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 396 kcal |
| Fat | 4.6 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 5.7 g |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kikkererwtenwafel has 10% fewer calories (356 kcal vs 396 kcal).
- Kikkererwtenwafels has 33% less fat (3.1 g vs 4.6 g).
- Kikkererwtenwafels has 27% less sugar (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Kikkererwtenwafel has 99% less salt (0 g vs 5.7 g).
- Kikkererwtenwafel has 44% more fiber (7.1 g vs 4 g).
- Kikkererwtenwafel has 20% more protein (15 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Kikkererwtenwafel
Kikkererwtenmeel" 34%, linzenmeel 31,5%, maismeel 30%, tapiocameel".
Kikkererwtenwafels
43% kikkererwtenmeel, rijstebloem, maïsgrut, aardappelzetmeel, zout. Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.44g per 100 gram
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kikkererwtenwafel or Kikkererwtenwafels?
Overall, Kikkererwtenwafel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kikkererwtenwafel has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kikkererwtenwafels has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.