Comparison

Protein Chickpeas vs Kikkererwtenwafels

Overall, Protein Chickpeas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientProtein ChickpeasKikkererwtenwafels
Nutri-Score a —
NOVA group — 3
Calories 380 kcal 396 kcal
Fat 3.6 g 3.1 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.4 g
Sugars 2.3 g 1.1 g
Salt 0 g 5.7 g
Fiber 8.6 g 4 g
Protein 20 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kikkererwtenwafels has 14% less fat (3.1 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Kikkererwtenwafels has 52% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Protein Chickpeas has no salt, while Kikkererwtenwafels has 5.7 g.
  • Protein Chickpeas has 53% more fiber (8.6 g vs 4 g).
  • Protein Chickpeas has 40% more protein (20 g vs 12 g).

Ingredients

Protein Chickpeas

Not available.

Kikkererwtenwafels

43% kikkererwtenmeel, rijstebloem, maïsgrut, aardappelzetmeel, zout. Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram en waarvan toegevoegd zout 0.44g per 100 gram

FAQ

Which is healthier: Protein Chickpeas or Kikkererwtenwafels?

Overall, Protein Chickpeas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Protein Chickpeas has fewer calories: 380 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kikkererwtenwafels has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons