Protein Chickpeas vs Kikkererwtenwafel
Overall, Protein Chickpeas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Protein Chickpeas | Kikkererwtenwafel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 3.6 g | 4.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.6 g | 7.1 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Protein Chickpeas has 22% less fat (3.6 g vs 4.6 g).
- Kikkererwtenwafel has 35% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Protein Chickpeas has 17% more fiber (8.6 g vs 7.1 g).
- Protein Chickpeas has 25% more protein (20 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Protein Chickpeas
Not available.
Kikkererwtenwafel
Kikkererwtenmeel" 34%, linzenmeel 31,5%, maismeel 30%, tapiocameel".
FAQ
Which is healthier: Protein Chickpeas or Kikkererwtenwafel?
Overall, Protein Chickpeas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kikkererwtenwafel has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kikkererwtenwafel has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.