Comparison
Kasza manna vs Cous cous
Overall, Cous cous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kasza manna | Cous cous |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 339 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.8 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cous cous has 45% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 339 kcal).
- Cous cous has 40% less fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Cous cous has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Kasza manna has 71% more fiber (6.8 g vs 2 g).
- Kasza manna has 30% more protein (10 g vs 7 g).
- Only Kasza manna lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kasza manna
100% _pszenica_
Cous cous
Soia Senape
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kasza manna or Cous cous?
Overall, Cous cous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cous cous has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 339 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kasza manna has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.