Comparison
Boulgour Gros vs Kasza manna
Overall, Boulgour Gros has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boulgour Gros | Kasza manna |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 351 kcal | 339 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 9.6 g | 6.8 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kasza manna has 41% less fat (1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Boulgour Gros has 29% more fiber (9.6 g vs 6.8 g).
- Boulgour Gros has 17% more protein (12 g vs 10 g).
Ingredients
Boulgour Gros
Blé dur précuit. Contient du gluten. Traces possibles d'arachide, de fruits à coque, de sésame et de sulfites.
Kasza manna
100% _pszenica_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boulgour Gros or Kasza manna?
Overall, Boulgour Gros has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kasza manna has fewer calories: 339 kcal versus 351 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boulgour Gros has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.