Irmas Ørredsalat vs Hamburgerryg
Overall, Hamburgerryg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Irmas Ørredsalat | Hamburgerryg |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 119 kcal |
| Fat | 39 g | 3.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 4 | 4 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburgerryg has 70% fewer calories (119 kcal vs 403 kcal).
- Hamburgerryg has 91% less fat (3.4 g vs 39 g).
- Hamburgerryg has 59% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 3.2 g).
- Hamburgerryg has no sugar, while Irmas Ørredsalat has 2 g.
- Hamburgerryg has 55% more protein (22 g vs 10 g).
- Hamburgerryg has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Irmas Ørredsalat lists: Fish, Milk.
Ingredients
Irmas Ørredsalat
Røget regnbueørred (Oncorhynchus mykiss) 40%, rapsolie, kvark (skummetmælk, salt, mælkesyrekul - tur), syltede forårsløg 4% (forårsløg, salt, eddike), pasteuriserede æggeblommer (fra fritgående høns), log, salt, eddike, sukker, modificeret kartoffelstivelse, surhedsregulerende midler (E 270, E 262), koncentreret citronsaft, konser - veringsmidler (E 202, E 211), dildspidser, hvid peber.
Hamburgerryg
Grisefilet (97%), salt, stabilisator (carrageenan), druesukker, kaliumchlorid, antioxidant (natriumascorbat), konserveringsmiddel (natriumnitrit).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Irmas Ørredsalat or Hamburgerryg?
Overall, Hamburgerryg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburgerryg has fewer calories: 119 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburgerryg has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.