Hamburgerryg vs Økologisk Leverpostej
Overall, Hamburgerryg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Hamburgerryg | Økologisk Leverpostej |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 119 kcal | 246 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 7.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 22 g | 9.8 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburgerryg has 52% fewer calories (119 kcal vs 246 kcal).
- Hamburgerryg has 83% less fat (3.4 g vs 20 g).
- Hamburgerryg has 83% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 7.5 g).
- Hamburgerryg has no sugar, while Økologisk Leverpostej has 1.7 g.
- Hamburgerryg has 55% more protein (22 g vs 9.8 g).
- Hamburgerryg has the better Nutri-Score.
- Økologisk Leverpostej is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Hamburgerryg
Grisefilet (97%), salt, stabilisator (carrageenan), druesukker, kaliumchlorid, antioxidant (natriumascorbat), konserveringsmiddel (natriumnitrit).
Økologisk Leverpostej
35 % griselever*, grisespæk*, vand, tapiokastivelse*, løg*, salt, æble*, peber*. = Økologisk.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Hamburgerryg or Økologisk Leverpostej?
Overall, Hamburgerryg has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburgerryg has fewer calories: 119 kcal versus 246 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hamburgerryg has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.