Irmas Ørredsalat vs Økologisk Leverpostej
Overall, Økologisk Leverpostej has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Irmas Ørredsalat | Økologisk Leverpostej |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 246 kcal |
| Fat | 39 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 7.5 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 9.8 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Økologisk Leverpostej has 39% fewer calories (246 kcal vs 403 kcal).
- Økologisk Leverpostej has 49% less fat (20 g vs 39 g).
- Irmas Ørredsalat has 57% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 7.5 g).
- Økologisk Leverpostej has 15% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Økologisk Leverpostej is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Irmas Ørredsalat lists: Fish, Milk.
Ingredients
Irmas Ørredsalat
Røget regnbueørred (Oncorhynchus mykiss) 40%, rapsolie, kvark (skummetmælk, salt, mælkesyrekul - tur), syltede forårsløg 4% (forårsløg, salt, eddike), pasteuriserede æggeblommer (fra fritgående høns), log, salt, eddike, sukker, modificeret kartoffelstivelse, surhedsregulerende midler (E 270, E 262), koncentreret citronsaft, konser - veringsmidler (E 202, E 211), dildspidser, hvid peber.
Økologisk Leverpostej
35 % griselever*, grisespæk*, vand, tapiokastivelse*, løg*, salt, æble*, peber*. = Økologisk.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Irmas Ørredsalat or Økologisk Leverpostej?
Overall, Økologisk Leverpostej has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Økologisk Leverpostej has fewer calories: 246 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Økologisk Leverpostej has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2 g per 100 g.