Irmas Ørredsalat vs Jæger Pølse
Overall, Jæger Pølse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Irmas Ørredsalat | Jæger Pølse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 403 kcal | 147 kcal |
| Fat | 39 g | 9 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 3.6 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 4 | 6 |
| Allergens | Fish, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jæger Pølse has 64% fewer calories (147 kcal vs 403 kcal).
- Jæger Pølse has 77% less fat (9 g vs 39 g).
- Irmas Ørredsalat has 11% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 3.6 g).
- Jæger Pølse has 70% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2 g).
- Irmas Ørredsalat has 32% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.2 g).
- Jæger Pølse has 17% more protein (12 g vs 10 g).
- Only Irmas Ørredsalat lists: Fish, Milk.
Ingredients
Irmas Ørredsalat
Røget regnbueørred (Oncorhynchus mykiss) 40%, rapsolie, kvark (skummetmælk, salt, mælkesyrekul - tur), syltede forårsløg 4% (forårsløg, salt, eddike), pasteuriserede æggeblommer (fra fritgående høns), log, salt, eddike, sukker, modificeret kartoffelstivelse, surhedsregulerende midler (E 270, E 262), koncentreret citronsaft, konser - veringsmidler (E 202, E 211), dildspidser, hvid peber.
Jæger Pølse
Grisekød 65%, vand, tapiocastivelse, stabilisatorer (carrageenan, E 451), salt, surhedsregule - rende midler (E 261, E 326), fibre fra hvedestrå (glutenfri), krydderiekstrakter, purløg, tørret løg, sukker, dextrose, antioxidant (E 301), konserveringsstof (E 250). Kogt. - Fedt er reduceret med mindst 30% i forhold til det gennemsnitlige fedtindhold i lignende produkter. DK 260 9,0 g EF 3,6 g 4,5 g 0,6 g 2 12 g 2,2 g Opbevares ved højst 5°C. Pakket i beskyttende atmosfære.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Irmas Ørredsalat or Jæger Pølse?
Overall, Jæger Pølse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jæger Pølse has fewer calories: 147 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jæger Pølse has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2 g per 100 g.