Harissa du Cap Bon El Manar vs Harissa du Cap-Bon
Overall, Harissa du Cap-Bon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Harissa du Cap Bon El Manar
Harissa du Cap-Bon
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Harissa du Cap Bon El Manar | Harissa du Cap-Bon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 96 kcal | 72 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 6.9 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Harissa du Cap-Bon has 25% fewer calories (72 kcal vs 96 kcal).
- Harissa du Cap-Bon has 50% less fat (1 g vs 2 g).
- Harissa du Cap-Bon has 43% less sugar (6.9 g vs 12 g).
- Harissa du Cap-Bon has 29% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.4 g).
- Harissa du Cap Bon El Manar has 19% more fiber (3.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Harissa du Cap-Bon has 31% more protein (2.9 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Harissa du Cap Bon El Manar
Mixture de piments rouges piquants 89,4%, Ail 3,5%, Coriandre 3,5%, Carvi 1,8%, Sel 1,6%, Correcteur PH: Acide Citrique. Avant ouverture conserver à l'abri de la chaleur et de l'humidité. Après ouverture, conserver au réfrigérateur entre 4°C et 6°C et consommer de préférence dans un délai de 5 jours.
Harissa du Cap-Bon
red hot pepper (87%), garlic, coriander, salt, caraway, acid: citric acid (e330)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Harissa du Cap Bon El Manar or Harissa du Cap-Bon?
Overall, Harissa du Cap-Bon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Harissa du Cap-Bon has fewer calories: 72 kcal versus 96 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Harissa du Cap-Bon has less sugar: 6.9 g versus 12 g per 100 g.