Harina integral de espelta vs Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham
Overall, Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Harina integral de espelta
Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Harina integral de espelta | Špaldová chlebová múka BIO g... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 341 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.3 g | 7.6 g |
| Protein | 12.2 g | 13.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has 63% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.4 g).
- Harina integral de espelta has 19% more fiber (9.3 g vs 7.6 g).
- Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has 10% more protein (13.7 g vs 12.2 g).
Ingredients
Harina integral de espelta
Harina de espelta integral
Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Harina integral de espelta or Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham?
Overall, Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Harina integral de espelta has fewer calories: 341 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.