Comparison

Harina integral de espelta vs Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham

Overall, Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHarina integral de espeltaŠpaldová chlebová múka BIO g...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 341 kcal 346 kcal
Fat 2.3 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.4 g
Sugars 2.4 g 0.9 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 9.3 g 7.6 g
Protein 12.2 g 13.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has 63% less sugar (0.9 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Harina integral de espelta has 19% more fiber (9.3 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has 10% more protein (13.7 g vs 12.2 g).

Ingredients

Harina integral de espelta

Harina de espelta integral

Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Harina integral de espelta or Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham?

Overall, Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Harina integral de espelta has fewer calories: 341 kcal versus 346 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Špaldová chlebová múka BIO graham has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons