Harina de espelta integral vs Špaldová múka hladká celozrnná BIO
Overall, Harina de espelta integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Harina de espelta integral
Špaldová múka hladká celozrnná BIO
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Harina de espelta integral | Špaldová múka hladká celozrn... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 342 kcal | 348 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9.3 g | 9.2 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 13.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Harina de espelta integral has 39% less fat (1.9 g vs 3.1 g).
Ingredients
Harina de espelta integral
Harina integral de trigo espelta
Špaldová múka hladká celozrnná BIO
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Harina de espelta integral or Špaldová múka hladká celozrnná BIO?
Overall, Harina de espelta integral has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Harina de espelta integral has fewer calories: 342 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Harina de espelta integral has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.