Fruits de mer vs Tempura Shrimp
Overall, Fruits de mer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fruits de mer | Tempura Shrimp |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 177 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 7.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 7.1 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 4 |
| Allergens | Crustaceans, Molluscs | Crustaceans, Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fruits de mer has 57% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 177 kcal).
- Fruits de mer has 75% less fat (1.8 g vs 7.1 g).
- Tempura Shrimp has 26% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.2 g).
- Fruits de mer has 72% less sugar (2 g vs 7.1 g).
- Fruits de mer has 37% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Fruits de mer has 39% more protein (13 g vs 8 g).
- Fruits de mer has the better Nutri-Score.
- Fruits de mer is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Fruits de mer lists: Molluscs.
- Only Tempura Shrimp lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Fruits de mer
Moules (36 0%1, anneaux de calamars [35 0%1, crevettes (27 0%1, eau, sel de table, sucre, correcteur d'acidité (carbonate de sodium).
Tempura Shrimp
SHRIMP, WATER, SALT, WHEAT FLOUR, SOYBEAN OIL, CORNSTARCH, MODIFIED FOOD STARCH, RICE FLOUR, YELLOW CORN FLOUR, SODIUM ACID PYROPHOSPHATE, BAKING SODA, DEXTROSE, SUGAR, SOY SAUCE, MALTODEXTRIN, YEAST EXTRACT.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fruits de mer or Tempura Shrimp?
Overall, Fruits de mer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fruits de mer has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 177 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fruits de mer has less sugar: 2 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.