Comparison
Flakes de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Flakes de sarrasin | Buchweizenflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 395 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 3.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.3 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Buchweizenflocken has 21% less fat (2.7 g vs 3.4 g).
- Buchweizenflocken has 10% more fiber (7 g vs 6.3 g).
- Flakes de sarrasin has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Only Flakes de sarrasin lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Flakes de sarrasin
Sarrasin
Buchweizenflocken
Buchweizenflocken* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Flakes de sarrasin or Buchweizenflocken?
Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Buchweizenflocken has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 395 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Buchweizenflocken has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Flocons de Sarrasin vs Flakes de sarrasin
Flakes de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Flakes de sarrasin vs Flocons de sarrasin
Flakes de sarrasin vs Buck Wheat Flakes
Pétales de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Flocons de Sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Pétales de sarrasin vs Flakes de sarrasin
Buchweizenflocken vs Buchweizenflocken