Comparison

Flocons de Sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken

Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Flocons de Sarrasin	Buchweizenflocken
Nutri-Score	a	a
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	357 kcal	364 kcal
Fat	2.6 g	2.7 g
Saturated fat	0.5 g	0.5 g
Sugars	1.5 g	0.5 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	7.1 g	7 g
Protein	10.3 g	12 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Buchweizenflocken has 67% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.5 g).
Buchweizenflocken has 14% more protein (12 g vs 10.3 g).

Ingredients

Flocons de Sarrasin

Flocons de sarrasin

Buchweizenflocken

Buchweizenflocken* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Flocons de Sarrasin or Buchweizenflocken?

Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flocons de Sarrasin has fewer calories: 357 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Buchweizenflocken has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Flocons de Sarrasin vs Flakes de sarrasin Flakes de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken Pétales de sarrasin vs Flocons de Sarrasin Pétales de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken Flocons de Sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken Flocons de Sarrasin vs Flocons de sarrasin Flocons de Sarrasin vs Buck Wheat Flakes Buchweizenflocken vs Buchweizenflocken