Pétales de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pétales de sarrasin | Buchweizenflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 370 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 2.9 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.2 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 14 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Buchweizenflocken has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Buchweizenflocken has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Buchweizenflocken has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Buchweizenflocken has 11% more fiber (7 g vs 6.2 g).
- Pétales de sarrasin has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Buchweizenflocken is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pétales de sarrasin lists: None.
Ingredients
Pétales de sarrasin
Farine de sarrasin* 99% (France), sel de mer. *Ingrédient issu de l'Agriculture biologique. Ingrédient issu d'une filière labellisée Bio Équitable en France Traces possibles de lait, gluten, soja, fruits à coque et graines de sésame
Buchweizenflocken
Buchweizenflocken* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pétales de sarrasin or Buchweizenflocken?
Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Buchweizenflocken has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 370 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Buchweizenflocken has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.