Comparison
Buchweizenflocken vs Buchweizenflocken
Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Buchweizenflocken | Buchweizenflocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 364 kcal | 364 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Lupin |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Buchweizenflocken has 49% more fiber (7 g vs 3.6 g).
- Only Buchweizenflocken lists: Lupin.
Ingredients
Buchweizenflocken
Buchweizenflocken* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.
Buchweizenflocken
Buchweizenflocken* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft
FAQ
Which is healthier: Buchweizenflocken or Buchweizenflocken?
Overall, Buchweizenflocken has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Buchweizenflocken has fewer calories: 364 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Buchweizenflocken has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Flakes de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Flakes de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Pétales de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Pétales de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Flocons de Sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Flocons de Sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken
Buchweizenflocken vs Flocons de sarrasin
Buchweizenflocken vs Buck Wheat Flakes