Comparison

Buchweizenflocken vs Flocons de sarrasin

Overall, Flocons de sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Buchweizenflocken	Flocons de sarrasin
Nutri-Score	—	a
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	364 kcal	334 kcal
Fat	2.7 g	1.5 g
Saturated fat	0.5 g	0.5 g
Sugars	0.5 g	0 g
Salt	0 g	0 g
Fiber	3.6 g	4 g
Protein	12 g	9 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	Lupin	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Flocons de sarrasin has 44% less fat (1.5 g vs 2.7 g).
Flocons de sarrasin has no sugar, while Buchweizenflocken has 0.5 g.
Buchweizenflocken has 25% more protein (12 g vs 9 g).
Only Buchweizenflocken lists: Lupin.

Ingredients

Buchweizenflocken

Buchweizenflocken* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft

Flocons de sarrasin

FAQ

Which is healthier: Buchweizenflocken or Flocons de sarrasin?

Overall, Flocons de sarrasin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Flocons de sarrasin has fewer calories: 334 kcal versus 364 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Flocons de sarrasin has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Flakes de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken Flakes de sarrasin vs Flocons de sarrasin Pétales de sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken Pétales de sarrasin vs Flocons de sarrasin Flocons de Sarrasin vs Buchweizenflocken Flocons de Sarrasin vs Flocons de sarrasin Buchweizenflocken vs Buchweizenflocken Buchweizenflocken vs Buck Wheat Flakes