Filet de bar vs Filet de Bar
Overall, Filet de Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de bar | Filet de Bar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 133 kcal | 123 kcal |
| Fat | 5.6 g | 4.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 21.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de Bar has 27% less fat (4.1 g vs 5.6 g).
- Filet de Bar has no sugar, while Filet de bar has 0.5 g.
- Filet de Bar has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Filet de Bar lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de bar
Bar (élevé en Turquie)
Filet de Bar
Dicentrarchus labrax
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de bar or Filet de Bar?
Overall, Filet de Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de Bar has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 133 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de Bar has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.