Comparison

Rillettes de bar au Yuzu vs Filet de Bar

Overall, Filet de Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRillettes de bar au YuzuFilet de Bar
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 155 kcal 123 kcal
Fat 9.4 g 4.1 g
Saturated fat 4.9 g 1.1 g
Sugars 1.1 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0.5 g
Protein 14 g 21.4 g
Additives20
AllergensMilk, MustardFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de Bar has 21% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 155 kcal).
  • Filet de Bar has 56% less fat (4.1 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Filet de Bar has 78% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Filet de Bar has no sugar, while Rillettes de bar au Yuzu has 1.1 g.
  • Filet de Bar has 88% less salt (0.1 g vs 1 g).
  • Filet de Bar has 35% more protein (21.4 g vs 14 g).
  • Filet de Bar has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Filet de Bar is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Rillettes de bar au Yuzu lists: Milk, Mustard.
  • Only Filet de Bar lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Rillettes de bar au Yuzu

Bar 50%, crème fraîche, jus de Yuzu 5%, échalotes, moutarde (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre, sel), carottes, ciboulette, farine de riz, sel, gomme xanthane, guar, poivre.

Filet de Bar

Dicentrarchus labrax

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rillettes de bar au Yuzu or Filet de Bar?

Overall, Filet de Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de Bar has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de Bar has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons