Comparison

Rillettes de bar au Yuzu vs Filet de bar

Overall, Filet de bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRillettes de bar au YuzuFilet de bar
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 155 kcal 133 kcal
Fat 9.4 g 5.6 g
Saturated fat 4.9 g 1.1 g
Sugars 1.1 g 0.5 g
Salt 1 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 14 g 20 g
Additives20
AllergensMilk, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de bar has 14% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 155 kcal).
  • Filet de bar has 40% less fat (5.6 g vs 9.4 g).
  • Filet de bar has 78% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 4.9 g).
  • Filet de bar has 55% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Filet de bar has 80% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Filet de bar has 30% more protein (20 g vs 14 g).
  • Filet de bar has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Rillettes de bar au Yuzu lists: Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Rillettes de bar au Yuzu

Bar 50%, crème fraîche, jus de Yuzu 5%, échalotes, moutarde (eau, graines de moutarde, vinaigre, sel), carottes, ciboulette, farine de riz, sel, gomme xanthane, guar, poivre.

Filet de bar

Bar (élevé en Turquie)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Rillettes de bar au Yuzu or Filet de bar?

Overall, Filet de bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de bar has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de bar has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons