Filets de bar avec peau vs Filet de bar
Overall, Filet de bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de bar avec peau | Filet de bar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 151 kcal | 133 kcal |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 5.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de bar has 12% fewer calories (133 kcal vs 151 kcal).
- Filet de bar has 36% less fat (5.6 g vs 8.8 g).
- Filet de bar has 44% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2 g).
- Filets de bar avec peau has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Filet de bar has 10% more protein (20 g vs 18 g).
- Only Filets de bar avec peau lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filets de bar avec peau
bar (Dicentrarchus labrax)
Filet de bar
Bar (élevé en Turquie)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de bar avec peau or Filet de bar?
Overall, Filet de bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de bar has fewer calories: 133 kcal versus 151 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de bar avec peau has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.