Filet de Bar vs Natural Brown Basmati Rice
Overall, Filet de Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de Bar | Natural Brown Basmati Rice |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 123 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 4.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 8.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de Bar has 65% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 350 kcal).
- Natural Brown Basmati Rice has 88% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.1 g).
- Natural Brown Basmati Rice has 91% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
- Natural Brown Basmati Rice has 69% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.5 g).
- Filet de Bar has 59% more protein (21.4 g vs 8.8 g).
- Filet de Bar has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Filet de Bar lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Filet de Bar
Dicentrarchus labrax
Natural Brown Basmati Rice
Brown basmati rice
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de Bar or Natural Brown Basmati Rice?
Overall, Filet de Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de Bar has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filet de Bar has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.