Comparison

Filet de Bar vs Natural Brown Basmati Rice

Overall, Filet de Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de BarNatural Brown Basmati Rice
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 123 kcal 350 kcal
Fat 4.1 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 0.5 g 1.6 g
Protein 21.4 g 8.8 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de Bar has 65% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 350 kcal).
  • Natural Brown Basmati Rice has 88% less fat (0.5 g vs 4.1 g).
  • Natural Brown Basmati Rice has 91% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Natural Brown Basmati Rice has 69% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Filet de Bar has 59% more protein (21.4 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Filet de Bar has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filet de Bar lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Filet de Bar

Dicentrarchus labrax

Natural Brown Basmati Rice

Brown basmati rice

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de Bar or Natural Brown Basmati Rice?

Overall, Filet de Bar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de Bar has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 350 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de Bar has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons