Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne vs Pipas Reyes
Overall, Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne | Pipas Reyes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 421 kcal | 591 kcal |
| Fat | 26.1 g | 48.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 4.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.7 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 4.8 g |
| Protein | 30.3 g | 27.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 29% fewer calories (421 kcal vs 591 kcal).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 46% less fat (26.1 g vs 48.4 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 44% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 4.8 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 22% less sugar (2.7 g vs 3.4 g).
- Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has 94% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Pipas Reyes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne
GRAINES DE TOURNESOL, GOMME ARABIQUE, ARÔME. PEUT CONTENIR DES TRACES D'ARACHIDES, DE SÉSAME, SOJA ET D'AUTRES NOIX.
Pipas Reyes
Pipa de girasol, agua y sal. Puede contener trazas de cacahuetes y frutos secos de cáscara.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne or Pipas Reyes?
Overall, Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has fewer calories: 421 kcal versus 591 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dakota Sonnenblumenkerne has less sugar: 2.7 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.